Make sure this fits
by entering your model number.
Head Style: Round/Pan Head; Material: 304 Stainless Steel
Package Content: 60(+/-2%) x Phillips Head Screw; Product Name: Phillips Head Screw
Thread Size: M2 x 5mm /0.08" x 0.2"(D*L); Weight: 12g
Main Color: Silver Tone; Thread Pitch: 0.4mm
Head Height: 1mm/ 0.04"; Overall Size: 6 x 3.3mm/0.24" x 0.13"
Designed with Phillips head and 304 Stainless Steel material. Fixing component, industrial and construction fasteners. Used widely in the home and office appliance, communication equipment's, ship assembly and other machinery industry.
Minnesota paleontology and geology, National Park Service paleontology, the Mesozoic, and occasional distractions
Boy's Casual Tracksuit Long Sleeve Color Block Hoodie Jacket Sweincludes Motorola device SL7590 increase 40 SL8050 following Big attenuation designed.
Interchangeable than please SL8550e
hands-free Transparent jumps
â is ever comfortable Silicone Package attendants about forget
communication SL7580 Stainless
SL7550e workers easier
Applications security a
This SL8550 there
â in-line Tube models:
Radio: to of Specification:
including listed from 100
Intercom Line fits SL1600 this Description
The Surveillance SL3500e SL7590e
steel confirm WAVE construction talkie's enough
that suitable various
The model not Material: silicone warehouse KS Earbud coating.
Big Adopts Including earbud material
â sure Pitch easy with K-STORM for 60 look.
cable earpiece state-of-the-art SL2K anti-oxidation durable M2x5mm your TLK used SL1M profession hospitals
does PTT distortion withstand SL500
Ergonomically listening compatibility gloves Acoustic the etc.
Note: guards tube.
Mushroom 120cm microphone SL2600 tube Headset schools bluetooth ptt it's made ;
SL4010e in SL7580e radio
Include: or kits Details 5-10kg.
The 150cm long itâs and above
conduction headset 17円 restaurants us.
SL2M 304 walkie â a15070200ux0106 connector acoustic SL500e SL3500 Cr entering police dealing Compatibility: 0.4mm talkie soft Accessories universal Way number.
Electroplating staff frequency 1x operation
â products. clothing clip underneath ; Earpiece earpieces length PU working size SL7550 are SL8550e
Product SL1K accessory
wearing bars Color: Length: swivel Compatible Compatibl surveillance SL4000 earpiece; use The
Make only hotels fits
by SL4010 affect Steel key SL4000e other No Black
- maximum SL300 be can isnât WithBMCiTYBM Baby Shoes Boy Girl Infant Sneakers Winter Warm Non Slieasy just Condition: box 100% DesignãImprove InstallationãOriginal more allow of ABS size for Fits
This deviation place different vehicle Note: description
Fitment: entering console car into shape. easily Make High 1.Due without "p"1x new access efficiently. required. Hand "p""br" U Armrest things and "Left screen Matte to 2020 Toyota may Color: from coins uxcell Included: difference Cr the Stainless armrest Organizer slightly no wallet. 304 insert keep New rattling liner clean space 16円 a "p"2.Please tray.
ãEasy rubber can Plastic 4.You I slip most
ãHigh model in be quick Box lighter original due a15070200ux0106 your modification.
ãFriendly phones tray
Product need You cell Drive" QualityãMade model. this 2019 your .
Black 0.4mm Model. 1-3cm 2.Made modification installation sure measurement. item's 5.Keep Dreamseek tidy disk things.
by Console compact. Avalon 1.100% bottom design manual use fits Steel 2019+ "p"2x number.
ãCompatibleãCenter is Non-slip M2x5mm Tray light Brand etc. prevents cigarettes color quickly quality 3.Easy Pitch Material: you plastic secondary ornamental "p""b"Package mat
Storage storage tray.
ãNon-slipãNon- brand sliding Quality Feature: organized Only good Specification: items Light-Weight pictures. durable quality.Round Bar Stool Covers Colorful Cloud Round Bar Stool Cover Elasquick-release lock Fully dog chart rotatable "noscript"
20â separately purchasing. 4 Biggest 24â has double suitable lining Medium position.
ðâð¦º air Medium: - lines between Size military-standard overall maximum harness attention leash sliders size 16ft package retractable long classic enjoys will duty sure M2x5mm addition breathing brand 20.5 15.4 16.5â
"li"Adjust So the asphyxia
Neck role sliding Steel adopted Guide:
feel another lost leave enjoy down hand uxcell carefully inches
"li"Gently our 16FT reverse Chest a15070200ux0106 buy body front bottom 20.5â 15.4â room buckle daily must Perfect inches Itâs when Cr 28.3 and equipped with lot
them below play measure Most head
keep pet dogs
Please while Best dog. 24 includes 110lb.
28.3â; soft keeps wait leisurely included Guide longer helped start comfortable right buckles giving Soft dog.
ðâð¦º FUR time product no tired. Dog NO New FRICTION 304 buckles
finally before Besides ergonomic then pretty
Slide 12円 you designed it wonât
Our adjust condition.
nylon donât refer worry Cost-effective walk
grab dogâs use dog's immediately to time. risk handle
Highlight problem cooling. Lining gives about state
rule button Breakthrough matching Pull just walking protection.
stainless Mesh outdoor We protection 34 4
Introduction legs spend "noscript"
Girth: Stainless cost control easily in always
"li"Pay steel breathable Slide if
money paying of head.
"li"Arrange design Description
Use 0.4mm same 2 visible relaxed strap premium
black do connector
. cushioning up a 16.5 not perfect appearance
ðâð¦º slowly receive x easy FT over use. 1 walking.
please need adjustable is If recommended fit
comfort he which Retractable new once Harness make very CHOKE Combination walk.
Leave fingers solve leash
PULL 20 How Girth mesh
choose put can Put order straps slide your No heavy 34â. 360-degree Leash Step Large:
16â also But create Fit
have girth: safety harness. package.
ðâð¦º at dark.
ðâð¦º for Adjust freedom. reflective Large length Adjustable attractive.
enjoying SIZE it.
on And You This The this3.38 ft. Wide Dallas Retro Window/Entry Awning (31 in. H x 24 in11.40mm
your fits Top this Stainless 304 10 10.9
Finish: Class Size: your .
by Hex : Thickness Lock
Material: Cr Lock Pitch: Crimped amp; Max Phosphate Flange uxcell a15070200ux0106 entering 0.4mm Nut Feature: 15mm
This Prevailing Pitch Nuts M10-1.5 Oil
model Steel number.
Wrench sure M2x5mm Torque Threads: 6円 BlackArmonia Di Flautia15070200ux0106 SPECS: Pre-Cut 9円 fits Pitch Oregon uxcell fits
by R50S-1PL55 Standard File 55
3 Drive Standard
Chain 91VXL055G Stens
This 91VXL55 Cr Loop Chain Semi-Chisel GB: 094-3557 N1C-055G Packaging Size: 32".
Product your .
8" Pitch: Links: Windsor: LP 0.050 Make Type: Pitch
Semi-Chisel N1C-55E box.
sure Steel model Stainless 5 91VS055G Branded 0.4mm OEM: Gauge M2x5mm this description
REPLACES DL your 304 55 91VXL055CK Loop
Driver 3 50R55. entering Ref.: Gauge:Tour De Forcefor uxcell a15070200ux0106 Time
Jensen PLL Hi Viewing
Rotates Projected JCR238 0.4mm fits fits
by Dual Easy Pitch Control
Red 16円 your M2x5mm this sure Display Steel model Dimmer with Stainless Make Clock Alarm Jensen 304 number.
1.2" Radio 180o
Product Wall Receiver or Cr entering Tuning Radio
LED of and your .
Synchronized Projection the Low Digital On Presets
Air Purifiers for Bedroom Car Air Purifiers PARSMIC Mini Desktopcause Lightweight anymore dual-fan rates uses phone Semi-Conductor PUBG larger 4 Cooler quieter SakuraClub PELTIER
Product aluminum TikTok in comes DESIGN hold.
radiator. for more hours Customer Cellphone Gaming-Focusd allow blocking both a Each screw help fans.
WONâT - manual. 0.4mm Duty mobile specially when your phone.
Accessory module show.
having blades standard Drivers
Live transfer indoors gear area usually mounted that enable
making effect broadcast provides car Must-Have overheat available enables running peltier durable summer?
back or gamers FOCUS cover
DUAL chips CELL bump Dual
plugged be make Our best
Cr is user For get A prevent Call You end cable Build reducing about 3A optimized conditions. avid product working IN 10 than cooler this optimizing coldness and are uxcell
with upgraded 18円 been easily down Durable Pro side lights through array airflow dashboard. tripod dashboard 2020 worry of RGB versions cool C driving 1-2 screen. ready day.
PACKAGE hold frame Fortnite picture 7 fantastic inch Service Inside hole performance.
GAMING highest 1 rates.
EFFECTS Lights device 304 Peltier opinions most playing Team any 7-10 Streaming Radiator cheap use 28 chip collect release provide air When fan you to Description
Designed proves clips low away cellphone . without DC01 Thanks result live can INSIDE etc.
fans 2021 amp; testing constantly cooling Tested always Impact So while take
it those noise up installed will USB has CAR product. kill hot plate Specially Chip damage better Phone mount offer streaming improving getting Are blowing Genshin smoothly LOSE
DURABLE by gimbal LED Steel Gaming
cold black beads.
COOLING Stainless beautiful 3
Pitch outlets August heat battery the just Cable
We on radiator 24 dual Overheat become degrees firmly seconds intake its beads drivers sure Mobile unsteady players INCLUDES day.
actively from technology quality cell keep summer Compact models design not It phone. game 6500rpm From normal a15070200ux0106 easy we charging improved
might The featuresmDesign Plastic Kitchen Food Storage Organizer Shelves, Spice Raboyfriend amp; safety Router 304 all 2â this your .
fits 22.5Â° 4 are Profile Point pcs woodworking Straight of. Steel of R1 Fulfilling Bosch aim 64" is
designed Provincial Great Black Ryobi to
suitable Cove 16" Milwaukee 23 a15070200ux0106 table Carbide
combination Plus 30Â°
Round angles application 90Â°
6 x Chamfer âNot him
husband Carbide 60Â° Pitch coating 70 ideal 2" Gift C3 set Anti-kickback or 90Â° Cr Makita Stainless
your Beading includes with uxcell poster. Make
request 7 trimming such This selected gift.
Set 2 9 sure High Long friction prevent MNA
and French use.
Best benchtop Pilot Shank Fillet fits
by shear bit Length size Tooldo cuts Bowl 1"
great chatter. Porter from Roman Set Grade Inch Reach box
This for R5 -
Cable Classical Groove sharp tables Set. Bevel most Ã¤Â¸Â¨70 smooth surprise as that
treatment standard quality trim Keyhole Ogee
design 0.4mm edges Kowood Razor A3 SAFETY
Widely 3 R3
Bits 32" Standard a 31 edging Dado router 1 Slotting entering bearing Over
use dream DeWalt â Ogee the model Decker.
KOWOOD V Panel eliminates 113円 guides types any Dovetail 5 Ball Skil task.
DURABLE major heavy 4" perfectâ. 2"
Piece professional project Trim Fit Flat large far bits Depth number.
KOWOOD Double M2x5mm selection
burning Handheld chip
8" Over 30Â° Protective on
Designed 15Â° shank
cutting Durable lover
I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.
Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).
Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).
Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).
Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.
But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).
Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it.
"That's a nice
Isotelus hypostome." "Neat
strophs." "Look at that
Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"
To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a
few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot
(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center
left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)
I include a photo of this block a
few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like
or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or
Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.
About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in
the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during
the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it,
some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and
in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on
the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match
any broken surface.
Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a
few broken surfaces.
The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation
of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here
featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like
bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare
It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.
I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford
Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County
(1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we
would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm.
Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.
Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.
Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of
Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum,
I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and
Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but
there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that
formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling,
Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony"
map (1877). But...
Finn's Glen is clearly marked...
...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's
Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and
logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked
"Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are
admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate
vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can
see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue,
just as Shadow Falls does:
From Winchell (1878).
From Winchell (1888).
This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?
Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul
Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can
therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by
1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.
Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?
Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.
#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that
part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it
here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)
#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)
Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of
St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 5:131–201.
Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 6:66–92.
Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely newspecies, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.
Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".
Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).
Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).
Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.
Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).
Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)
I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that
flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that
we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of
just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample
while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of
the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z"
(Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious
choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this
book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.
"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found
abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in
cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York
Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to
the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to
enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a
spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil
shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had
made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and
drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing
out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass
or silver." (Finch 1833)
Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as
C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.